{"id":1516,"date":"2016-08-19T21:12:33","date_gmt":"2016-08-19T21:12:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.revista-educacion-matematica.org.mx\/revista\/?p=1516"},"modified":"2016-08-19T22:11:28","modified_gmt":"2016-08-19T22:11:28","slug":"esp1-6-en","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.revista-educacion-matematica.org.mx\/revista\/2016\/08\/19\/esp1-6-en\/","title":{"rendered":"Phenomenology, Praxis, and the Question of Mathematical Objects"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Luis Radford<\/p>\n<p><strong>Abstract:<\/strong> In this article, I discuss some aspects of the manner in which phenomenology<br \/>\nhas dealt with the question of the nature of objects of knowledge and the knowability of<br \/>\nsuch objects. I focus on Kant\u2019s phenomenology and consider in particular some ontological<br \/>\npresuppositions that make Kant\u2019s phenomenology both Platonist and anti-Platonist.<br \/>\nThen, I make a brief incursion into Hegel\u2019s phenomenological approach and Marx\u2019s<br \/>\ncritique of Hegel, Kant, and German idealism in general. In the last part of the article,<br \/>\nI comment on Marx\u2019s idea of praxis as an entirely new path to tackle the question of<br \/>\nthe nature and knowability of objects of knowledge. I discuss some of the implications<br \/>\nof such an idea for mathematics education. I end up sketching a Hegelian dialectic<br \/>\nmaterialist concept of knowledge that provides room for understanding knowledge as<br \/>\nsomething ineluctably embedded in cultural praxis.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Keywords<\/strong>: phenomenology, sense, sensation, mathematical objects, praxis, dialectical<br \/>\nmaterialism.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.revista-educacion-matematica.org.mx\/descargas\/Esp-1-6.pdf\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-279\" src=\"http:\/\/www.revista-educacion-matematica.org.mx\/revista\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/download.png\" alt=\"download\" width=\"200\" height=\"71\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.revista-educacion-matematica.org.mx\/revista\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/download.png 200w, https:\/\/www.revista-educacion-matematica.org.mx\/revista\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/download-150x53.png 150w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"border-radius: 2px; text-indent: 20px; width: auto; padding: 0px 4px 0px 0px; text-align: center; font: bold 11px\/20px 'Helvetica Neue',Helvetica,sans-serif; color: #ffffff; background: #bd081c  no-repeat scroll 3px 50% \/ 14px 14px; position: absolute; opacity: 1; z-index: 8675309; display: none; cursor: pointer;\">Guardar<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Luis Radford Abstract: In this article, I discuss some aspects of the manner in which phenomenology has dealt with the question of the nature of objects of knowledge and the knowability of such objects. I focus on Kant\u2019s phenomenology and consider in particular some ontological presuppositions that make Kant\u2019s phenomenology\u2026 <a class=\"continue-reading-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.revista-educacion-matematica.org.mx\/revista\/2016\/08\/19\/esp1-6-en\/\">Continue reading<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[220],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.revista-educacion-matematica.org.mx\/revista\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1516"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.revista-educacion-matematica.org.mx\/revista\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.revista-educacion-matematica.org.mx\/revista\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.revista-educacion-matematica.org.mx\/revista\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.revista-educacion-matematica.org.mx\/revista\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1516"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.revista-educacion-matematica.org.mx\/revista\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1516\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1543,"href":"https:\/\/www.revista-educacion-matematica.org.mx\/revista\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1516\/revisions\/1543"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.revista-educacion-matematica.org.mx\/revista\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1516"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.revista-educacion-matematica.org.mx\/revista\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1516"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.revista-educacion-matematica.org.mx\/revista\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1516"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}